⚖️🕵️ Koldo case: Ábalos trial transfer and UCO evidence
Oneliner
The Koldo case involving former Transport Minister José Luis Ábalos is seeing significant developments as his defense seeks to transfer the trial to the National Court following his resignation from Congress. The prosecution is seeking lengthy prison sentences for Ábalos and his adviser Koldo García. Concurrently, Judge Santiago Pedraz has forwarded a report implicating Ábalos in a hydrocarbon scheme, alleging that a network allocated one million euros to influence public officials. The Supreme Court's decision on jurisdiction will be pivotal in the ongoing proceedings.
Key points
- Ábalos and Koldo García's defense seeks to transfer their trial to the National Court.
- Judge Pedraz has forwarded significant evidence implicating Ábalos in a hydrocarbon scheme.
- The prosecution is seeking lengthy prison sentences for the accused.
- The case raises questions about jurisdiction and the right to appeal.
Links
Facts
- Ábalos faces 24 years in prison; Koldo García faces 19 years.
- The UCO report alleges one million euros were allocated to influence officials.
- Carmen Pano testified about delivering cash to the PSOE headquarters.
- The Supreme Court's ruling on jurisdiction could affect the trial's outcome.
Quotes
- Competence is determined by the order opening the oral trial — Alejandro Luzón, Anti-Corruption Prosecutor.
- The Supreme Court’s instruction is a weak argument — José Antonio Martín Pallín, Emeritus Supreme Court judge.
Article
🔒 Access the full content
Upgrade to unlock the full distillation, context, and source trail.
Already subscribed? Open today’s newsletter and follow your personal access link.
